bitcoin

Cryptocurrency scams and theft are on the rise, targeting both individuals and business entities. Criminals use sophisticated methods to steal cryptocurrency funds, including hacking, phishing, and social engineering. These actors often gain access to victims’ accounts through deceptive tactics, making it difficult to secure digital assets. Law firms play a crucial role in assisting business clients with recovering stolen assets and managing legal risks associated with cryptocurrency holdings. Tracing cryptocurrency transactions is particularly challenging due to the pseudonymous nature of blockchain technology, which complicates recovery efforts. Scammers frequently request payments in cryptocurrency, exploiting the speed and anonymity of digital currency transfers. It is essential for scammers to be identified by law enforcement to increase the chances of asset recovery.

Fraudulent platforms often mimic the appearance of a legitimate business, making it difficult for users to distinguish between a real service and a scam. Always verify that a website is operated by a legitimate business before investing or transferring funds. Scammers may also use blackmail tactics, threatening to release compromising photos unless victims pay in cryptocurrency. These schemes rely on leveraging sensitive information to coerce victims into making payments. Reporting scams to gov agencies such as the IC3, FTC, or CFTC is a key step in the recovery process.

Introduction to Cryptocurrency and Scams

Cryptocurrency has rapidly become a mainstream form of digital currency, attracting investors and users worldwide with the promise of fast, borderless transactions and innovative investment opportunities. At the heart of every cryptocurrency transaction is the blockchain—a public ledger that records all transactions and helps ensure their integrity. However, the very features that make crypto appealing, such as the anonymity of transactions and the lack of centralized oversight, also create opportunities for bad actors to perpetrate crypto scams and theft.

Victims of crypto scams often find it challenging to recover stolen funds due to the difficulty of tracing transactions across the blockchain’s anonymous landscape. Scammers may lure individuals with promises of high returns, fake investment advice, or fraudulent websites that appear to be legitimate businesses. To protect yourself and your cryptocurrency funds, it’s essential to remain vigilant: always verify the authenticity of any platform or individual before sending money, be wary of offers that seem too good to be true, and never share sensitive information or passwords. By understanding the risks and taking proactive steps, you can reduce your chances of becoming a victim and help safeguard your investments in the world of digital currencies.

Attorney Marc Fitapelli Discusses How to Sue Coinbase

Crypto Fraud, Hacking & Account Takeover Litigation Practice

Our Cryptocurrency Fraud, Hacking & Account Takeover Litigation Practice is dedicated exclusively to representing individuals, families, and business clients whose digital assets were stolen, misappropriated, frozen, or lost due to cybersecurity failures, account takeovers, and sophisticated fraud schemes. Losses often involve unauthorized payments made in cryptocurrency, and we also handle cases involving unauthorized or fraudulent cryptocurrency transactions and money laundering through cryptocurrency.

We operate nationwide. Because most major cryptocurrency exchanges, including Coinbase and crypto.com, require disputes to be resolved through arbitration—often administered by the American Arbitration Association—our practice is structured around navigating these forums effectively while preserving all available legal claims. In most cases, similar legal strategies are used to recover assets, regardless of the specific facts.

Arbitration is not immunity. It is simply a different venue in which the law still applies. Perpetrators are often identified through forensic investigation.

Impersonation of Cryptocurrency Exchange Employees

One of the fastest-growing and most damaging forms of cryptocurrency fraud involves impersonation of exchange employees. Victims are contacted by individuals claiming to work for well-known platforms such as Coinbase or other major exchanges. These communications often appear legitimate. Scammers frequently create fake websites that closely resemble those of a legitimate business, making it difficult for victims to distinguish between real and fraudulent platforms. The scammers use accurate branding, professional language, and internal terminology. In many cases, they already possess personal information about the victim or reference recent account activity.

The message is urgent and alarming. Victims are told there has been suspicious activity, a security breach, or an imminent risk to their funds. Scammers use the personal information they have obtained to gain access to victims’ accounts. Victims are instructed to take immediate action to “secure” their cryptocurrency. This usually involves transferring assets to a so-called safe wallet, secure address, or temporary holding account.

In reality, the destination is controlled by the fraudster. The goal of these criminals is to steal cryptocurrency from unsuspecting victims. Once the transfer occurs, the cryptocurrency is irretrievably diverted.

When victims report the loss, exchanges frequently respond by stating that the transaction was authorized and therefore irreversible. That response is not always legally dispositive.

Impersonation scams raise serious questions about the adequacy of an exchange’s warnings, monitoring systems, customer communications, and fraud prevention measures. Where impersonation becomes widespread or predictable, exchanges may have a duty to respond proactively. Failure to do so can create legal exposure.

Our practice focuses on identifying whether exchanges met their legal and regulatory obligations in the face of known impersonation threats and whether their failures contributed to consumer losses. Successful recovery efforts often depend on whether the perpetrators can be identified by investigators.

Hacking, Account Takeovers, and Unauthorized Access

Impersonation schemes often overlap with hacking and account takeover incidents. Criminals may use SIM-swap attacks, phishing emails, malicious links, or malware to gain access to accounts. Once criminals have gained access, unauthorized cryptocurrency transactions and payments can occur within minutes.

In many cases, the intent of these actors is to steal funds. The activity is inconsistent with the customer’s prior behavior. Large withdrawals, new wallet addresses, foreign IP locations, or unusual timing may be evident. Yet the transfers are permitted to proceed without meaningful intervention.

When exchanges fail to implement reasonable safeguards or ignore obvious warning signs, they may bear responsibility for the resulting losses. Our firm investigates how access was obtained, what security systems were in place, and whether the exchange complied with applicable legal standards. Forensic analysis can help ensure that hackers are identified.

Contractual Disclaimers and Legal Duties

Cryptocurrency exchanges frequently rely on extensive terms of service that attempt to disclaim liability for hacking, fraud, or third-party misconduct. These legal duties apply to both individual and business clients. Regulatory agencies such as the exchange commission oversee compliance for cryptocurrency exchanges, ensuring that both types of clients are protected. Consumers are often told that by agreeing to these terms, they have waived any right to recovery.

This is not always correct.

Private contracts do not override statutory duties. Companies cannot disclaim responsibility for violations of consumer protection laws, cybersecurity regulations, tax regulations, or elder abuse statutes. Gov agencies, such as the IC3, FTC, and CFTC, are sources of statutory duties that exchanges must follow. Courts and arbitrators routinely examine whether contractual provisions conflict with public policy or statutory obligations.

Where a duty is imposed by law, contractual language may not provide a shield. Our litigation strategy is built around identifying these duties and enforcing them. In most cases, courts require that responsible parties be identified before liability is imposed.

Nationwide Arbitration Against Cryptocurrency Exchanges

Most major cryptocurrency exchanges require arbitration as a condition of account use. These proceedings are commonly administered by the American Arbitration Association or similar forums, and may involve regulatory oversight from agencies such as the exchange commission.

Our firm represents both individuals and business clients nationwide in cryptocurrency arbitrations. We understand the procedural rules, evidentiary standards, and strategic considerations unique to these cases. Evidence often includes records of cryptocurrency transactions, which are critical in tracing digital assets. Arbitration does not diminish the seriousness of a claim. In many instances, it allows for a more focused and efficient resolution, while also considering relevant gov regulations as part of the process.

We prepare cases with the expectation that they will be fully litigated. In most cases, arbitration follows similar procedures, regardless of the specific facts. We do not rely on informal complaints or internal review processes. We pursue legally grounded claims supported by evidence and expert analysis. For arbitration to proceed, all parties must be identified.

Cybersecurity Obligations Under New York Law

New York has enacted some of the most robust cybersecurity regulations in the country. Cryptocurrency exchanges that operate in or service New York residents are expected to maintain reasonable cybersecurity systems designed to protect consumer information and assets. These obligations apply to both individual and business clients, as both face significant risks from cyber threats.

These obligations include risk assessments, access controls, monitoring, incident response planning, and ongoing oversight. Regulatory agencies such as the exchange commission may oversee compliance, and tax compliance is also a consideration. Inadequate cybersecurity can facilitate money laundering, as hackers use various methods to gain access to systems and exploit vulnerabilities.

Our practice closely examines whether exchanges complied with New York cybersecurity requirements and whether deficiencies contributed to hacking, account takeovers, or impersonation fraud. Breaches are often identified through forensic analysis to determine the source and scope of the incident. In most cases, compliance failures are similar, allowing us to apply proven strategies to address these issues.

Federal Protections and the Electronic Funds Transfer Act

Although cryptocurrency is often described as existing outside traditional financial regulation, many crypto losses involve electronic fund transfers governed by federal law. The Electronic Funds Transfer Act was enacted to protect consumers from unauthorized electronic transactions and to allocate responsibility between consumers and financial institutions. Federal gov agencies enforce the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, and our firm represents both individuals and business clients in federal claims.

In appropriate cases, EFTA protections may apply to cryptocurrency-related losses, particularly where bank accounts, debit cards, or custodial services are involved. The exchange commission may also have a role in oversight of digital asset trading platforms. Evidence in these cases often includes cryptocurrency transactions, and tax compliance is also relevant. Importantly, consumer negligence does not automatically bar recovery under the statute.

Our firm evaluates the applicability of federal law alongside state claims to ensure that all available remedies are pursued. In most cases, similar legal standards apply to the recovery of crypto assets.

Losses must be identified for claims to proceed.

Pig Butchering and Long-Con Cryptocurrency Fraud

Impersonation scams frequently intersect with so-called pig butchering scams, a type of long-con fraud where criminals build trust with victims over time. These scams often mimic ponzi schemes by promising high returns on crypto investments. Victims are encouraged to make payments or pay in cryptocurrency, believing in the legitimacy of the opportunity.

These schemes are sophisticated and emotionally devastating. Criminals display false account balances and fabricated profit reports to lure victims, with the ultimate goal to steal funds. While the perpetrators may be difficult to pursue directly, liability does not necessarily end with them. Exchanges and intermediaries that facilitate fraudulent transfers or ignore warning signs may still be held accountable.

We investigate all potential avenues of recovery and pursue claims against all responsible parties.

Elder Financial Abuse and Cryptocurrency Losses

Older adults are disproportionately targeted by impersonation scams and account takeovers. Many seniors are pressured into transferring cryptocurrency after being told their accounts are compromised or under investigation. Criminals often use sophisticated methods to steal digital assets from vulnerable individuals.

State elder financial abuse laws recognize this vulnerability and impose heightened duties on financial institutions and business entities that handle the assets of older adults. These statutes often provide enhanced remedies when seniors are victimized, and gov agencies such as the FTC and CFTC play a key role in enforcing these laws.

Our practice places particular emphasis on representing older clients and their families. We approach these cases with seriousness, diligence, and respect for the significant personal impact of the loss. In order to pursue recovery, it is crucial that perpetrators are identified so that legal action can be taken. In most cases, similar remedies and strategies are available to help victims recover their assets.

DeFi Hacks and Market Shift

The decentralized finance (DeFi) sector has seen a notable shift in the landscape of cryptocurrency funds security. While the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi protocols continues to rise, the number of successful hacks has decreased, indicating that security measures across the industry are improving. Despite this progress, the risk of DeFi hacks remains a significant concern for users and investors. Sophisticated attacks, such as flash loan exploits and reentrancy attacks, can still result in substantial financial losses, even for experienced users.

To protect your cryptocurrency funds in the DeFi market, it’s crucial to invest only in reputable protocols with a proven track record of security and transparency. Regularly monitor your accounts for unusual activity, and stay informed about the latest threats and vulnerabilities. By understanding the value and risk associated with DeFi investments, users can make informed decisions and take steps to safeguard their funds in this rapidly evolving financial landscape.

Protecting Your Wallet Address

Your wallet address is the gateway to your cryptocurrency funds, making its protection a top priority in preventing crypto theft and scams. A wallet address acts as a unique identifier for sending and receiving digital assets, but if it falls into the wrong hands, your funds could be at risk. To keep your wallet address secure, avoid sharing it with unknown individuals or on untrusted websites, and always use a reputable wallet provider that offers advanced security features like two-factor authentication and multi-signature support.

Consider using a hardware wallet, which stores your private keys offline and provides an extra layer of protection against hacking attempts. Regularly update your wallet software to patch any security vulnerabilities, and remain alert to phishing scams that attempt to trick you into revealing sensitive information. By taking these precautions, you can help ensure that your wallet address—and your cryptocurrency funds—remain secure and protected from unauthorized access and theft.

Reporting Scams to Authorities

If you become a victim of a crypto scam or notice suspicious activity involving your cryptocurrency funds, it’s vital to report the incident to the appropriate authorities as soon as possible. In the United States, you can file a report with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) through their Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) or contact the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). When reporting, provide detailed information such as transaction IDs, wallet addresses, and any communications with the scammer. This information can assist law enforcement in investigating the scam and may increase the chances of recovering stolen funds.

Reporting scams not only helps your own recovery efforts but also contributes to the broader fight against crypto fraud, making the cryptocurrency market safer for all users. Prompt action and thorough documentation are key steps in holding scammers accountable and protecting future victims.

Expertise of the Legal Team

At the heart of our law firm is a legal team with deep expertise in cryptocurrency law, asset recovery, and regulatory compliance. Our attorneys are well-versed in the complexities of blockchain technology and have a proven track record of tracing and recovering stolen cryptocurrency funds for clients who have fallen victim to fraud, theft, or disputes. We understand the unique challenges posed by digital currencies and work closely with forensic experts, law enforcement agencies, and centralized exchanges to maximize the chances of successful recovery.

Our legal team provides tailored advice on protecting your cryptocurrency investments, navigating regulatory requirements, and pursuing claims against bad actors. Whether you are facing a sophisticated hacking scheme, a ponzi scam, or a dispute with an exchange, our firm is committed to helping you recover your funds and secure your financial future. With our in-depth knowledge and collaborative approach, you can trust us to advocate for your interests and guide you through every step of the recovery process.

A Litigation-Focused Recovery Practice

Our Cryptocurrency Fraud, Hacking & Account Takeover Litigation Practice is focused on recovery through legal action for both individual and business clients. We investigate the facts, including gathering evidence such as records of cryptocurrency transactions and unauthorized payments. We preserve evidence. We pursue arbitration and litigation grounded in statutory and common-law principles.

We do not promise outcomes. We do promise a disciplined, aggressive approach to accountability. In order to recover assets, it is essential that perpetrators are identified through careful tracing and analysis.

If you lost cryptocurrency after being contacted by someone impersonating an exchange employee, or if your account was hacked or taken over, you should not assume that the terms of service foreclose your rights. Exchanges have legal obligations. Contracts have limits. Laws still apply.

Legal remedies may exist, and timely action can be critical. In most cases, similar legal strategies are used to pursue recovery, even though each situation is unique.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I have a case if I authorized the transfer?

Possibly. Many cryptocurrency fraud cases involve victims who were manipulated, deceived, or pressured into taking actions they believed were necessary to protect their accounts. Authorization obtained through impersonation, fraud, or coercion is not always treated as valid authorization under the law. Liability often depends on whether the loss occurred because of a failure by the exchange or another institution to meet legal obligations related to security, warnings, monitoring, or fraud prevention. In most cases, similar legal principles apply regardless of the specific facts.

What types of losses can be pursued in a cryptocurrency fraud case?

Claims may seek recovery of stolen cryptocurrency, the monetary value of lost digital assets, and in some cases additional damages recognized under applicable law. Profit obtained by criminals through fraudulent activity may also be a measure of damages. The specific remedies available depend on the facts of the case and the laws that apply. Not every loss is recoverable, but many victims have more options than they initially believe.

Can I bring a claim even if the exchange’s terms of service limit liability?

Yes, in some circumstances. Both individuals and business clients are eligible to bring claims. Contracts do not always eliminate legal responsibility. Statutory duties, consumer protection laws, cybersecurity regulations, and elder abuse laws can impose obligations that override or limit contractual disclaimers. Whether a limitation is enforceable depends on the facts and the law.

What if the exchange says the transaction was irreversible?

The technical irreversibility of a blockchain transaction does not necessarily determine legal responsibility. In some cases, security measures or legal action may allow a transaction to be reversed or damages to be mitigated. The key question is often whether the loss should have occurred in the first place. Claims frequently focus on failures in security, monitoring, warnings, or response rather than the mechanics of the transaction itself.

Do you handle cases nationwide?

Yes. Cryptocurrency disputes are often resolved through arbitration rather than traditional court litigation, and those proceedings can typically be handled on a nationwide basis. We represent clients across the country.

Will my case be in court or arbitration?

Many cryptocurrency exchanges require arbitration, often through the American Arbitration Association or similar forums. Arbitration is a legal process with formal rules, evidence, and hearings. It is not an informal complaint process. In some situations, court litigation may also be appropriate.

How are attorney’s fees handled?

In appropriate cases, we may handle cryptocurrency fraud matters on a contingency fee basis. This means legal fees are tied to recovery rather than paid upfront. Not all cases qualify, and the fee structure is discussed in detail before any representation begins.

What evidence should I gather if I think I was defrauded?

Preserving evidence is critical. This may include account statements, transaction histories, records of cryptocurrency transactions and payments, communications with the exchange, emails or messages from individuals claiming to be exchange employees, screenshots, phone records, and any reports made to law enforcement or regulators. Do not alter or delete information if possible. An attorney can help identify what is most important.

What should I expect during the process?

Cryptocurrency fraud cases can take time. Investigation, evidence collection, and legal proceedings do not happen overnight. The process typically involves an initial evaluation, fact development, formal claims, and litigation or arbitration. While some matters resolve earlier, others require sustained advocacy.

Does negligence on my part automatically defeat a claim?

Not necessarily. Many consumer protection statutes recognize that fraud victims may make mistakes under pressure or deception. Whether negligence affects a claim depends on the applicable law and the specific facts.

What if I am an older adult or the victim is a senior?

Many states have laws that provide additional protections for older adults who are financially exploited. These laws may impose heightened duties on institutions and provide enhanced remedies. Cases involving seniors are evaluated with these protections in mind.

Is there a deadline to bring a claim?

Yes. Legal claims are subject to time limits, which vary depending on the type of claim and jurisdiction. Delays can limit available options. Speaking with an attorney sooner rather than later is often important.

What happens during an initial consultation?

An initial consultation is focused on understanding what happened, identifying potential legal issues, and discussing whether further review is appropriate. It is an opportunity to ask questions and learn about possible next steps, not a commitment to pursue a claim.